Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these kinds of systems. Coming from lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the line to a system for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being employed in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs all their capacity to navigate these devices and to go after their legal right for proper protection.

It also illustrates how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering these people from opening the stations of safeguards. It www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice/ further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms for these technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who all are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double result: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also generate it difficult for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.

0 réponses

Répondre

Se joindre à la discussion ?
Vous êtes libre de contribuer !

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *